🔗 Share this article

A decade after the UK embarked on a hasty referendum that split the nation and unleashed turmoil, a advisory comes from beyond the Irish Sea: it may occur once more.

Policymakers and electorate drifted into Brexit and the identical may happen with a referendum on a united Ireland, sparking disturbances for which no one is prepared.

That represents the warning from two respected writers from either side of the Irish border who have collaborated to scrutinise the benefits and drawbacks of Northern Ireland leaving the UK to create a fresh nation with the Republic of Ireland.

Political Structures Ill-Equipped

The author and columnist and The Northern Ireland editor, have found that the government bodies in Ireland and Britain are extremely ill-prepared for a possibly tense and monumental referendum.

"The crucial insight of Brexit hasn't been learned, which is that events can arise suddenly and can gather momentum swiftly," the commentator remarked. "In my opinion that the political architecture of our islands remains very unstable."

Book Publication Aims to Provoke Discussion

The duo have studied the political, financial and cultural reasons for any constitutional change in a volume, The Case For and Against Unification, issued by the Irish Royal Irish Academy.

They seek to provoke discussion on the issue with a series of lectures that will take them to Westminster in the coming weeks.

"What concerns everybody, or should haunt every person, is the Brexit referendum of 2016," commented the analyst.

"We should prevent a referendum on a yes-no, unclear proposal whose consequences have remained undefined because then you find yourself with an extremely divided society where the losing side are not reconciled to losing and the people who have won are uncertain exactly what it is that they have achieved."

Constitutional Provision

Under the Good Friday agreement, the Northern Ireland government minister is obliged to schedule a referendum on Irish unity if it appears likely that a most voters would vote in favour.

Sinn Féin and other nationalists say such a time is looming, and a organisation named Ireland’s Future has garnered backing, but authorities in Dublin and London and unionists downplay the likelihood, resulting in ambiguity when or if there might be a referendum.

Insufficient Substantive Discussion

Political rhetoric for and against unification has masked the lack of serious debate, said McBride.

"People tend to be for or against the notion but the detailed consideration which could extend past that to realise it is mostly absent. A great deal has taken place in scholarly circles but very few elected officials or activists seek to involve themselves with the basics. As an example, which kind of country might be preferred? Unitary? Decentralised?"

Book's Approach

In the book, none of the commentators endorses unity or the current situation. They authors two essays that aim for impartiality in laying out the case for a unified Ireland and the argument against, gathering financial and social data, past examples and structural examples.

Discussions range over flags and symbols, taxes, health services, pensions, public liabilities and the threat of loyalist violence. The goal is to inform and encourage conversation.

"There is significant curiosity in the topic but there is still lacking a debate," stated the writer. "Debate implies an acknowledgement of the concept that there may exist valid points on both sides."

Simultaneous Plebiscites

A referendum in Northern Ireland would additionally cause one in the republic, where the electorate claim they prefer unification but reject greater financial contributions or introducing a alternative symbol to reflect unionists' UK heritage.

"Policymakers in Ireland should establish what the proposal from nationalist groups is aside from just saying: 'We desire a unified Ireland and we value you'," stated the commentator.

Likelihood of Referendum

McBride thinks a referendum in his era is probable and that it may take place unexpectedly. "It is possible just a irresponsible or a poor or a incompetent government minister who says: 'Let's just do this and settle the matter.'"

Each of the nationalists and unionists have plausible, justified perspectives, he said. "One side will prevail here and somebody will eventually lose but all factions has has something to acquire from the other's viewpoints."

Appeal for Broader Debate

Westminster should join the dialogue, said O’Toole. "This concerns Britain. It's a UK matter equally as it is an Irish issue."